LAS PARADOJAS DE ZENON DE ELEA PDF

Zenón de Elea: Filósofo griego. (c. a. C.) -Escuela eleática. – Es conocido por sus paradojas, especialmente aquellas que niegan la. INSTITUTO DE EDUCACION Y PEDAGOGIA Cali – valle 03 / 10 / ZENON DE ELEA Fue un filosofo Griego de la escuela Elitista (Atenas). Paradojas de Zenón 1. paradoja de la dicotomía(o la carrera) 2. paradja de aquiles y la tortuga. Conclusion Discípulo de parménides de Elea.

Author: Daijind Gagal
Country: Iceland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 13 May 2017
Pages: 340
PDF File Size: 13.13 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.59 Mb
ISBN: 943-7-16016-759-6
Downloads: 65974
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Voodoorisar

Given 1, years of opposition to actual infinities, the burden of proof was on anyone advocating them.

This is an attack on plurality. Each point mass is a movable point carrying a fixed mass. In attacking justification iiAristotle objects that, if Zeno were to confine his notion of infinity to a potential infinity and were to reject the idea of zero-length sub-paths, then Achilles achieves his goal in a finite time, so this is a way out of the paradox. Suppose there exist many things rather than, as Parmenides would say, just one thing.

It contains some of the same elements as the Achilles and the Tortoise paradox, but with a more apparent conclusion of motionlessness. This is the most challenging of all the paradoxes of plurality.

On Plato’s interpretation, it could reasonably be ekea that Zeno reasoned this way: InBerkeley had properly criticized the use of infinitesimals as being “ghosts of departed quantities” that are used inconsistently in calculus. The contemporary notion of measure developed in the 20th century by Brouwer, Lebesgue, and others showed how to properly define the measure function so that a line segment has nonzero measure even though the singleton set of any point has a zero measure.

Aristotle believed a line can be composed only of smaller, indefinitely divisible lines and not of points without magnitude. If so, then choice 2 above is the one to think about. The ideas of Planck length and Planck time in modern physics place a limit on the measurement of time and space, if not on time and space themselves. The practical use of infinitesimals was unsystematic.

  FISIOPATOLOGIA PTERIGION PDF

Zeno’s paradoxes

Some of Zeno’s nine surviving paradoxes preserved in Aristotle’s Physics [3] [4] and Simplicius’s commentary thereon are essentially equivalent to one another. Zeno is wrong in saying that there is no part of the millet that does not make a sound: Therefore, each part of a plurality will be so large as to be infinite. Aristotle, in Physics Z9, said of the Dichotomy that it is possible for a runner to come in zeonn with a potentially infinite number of things in a finite time provided the time intervals becomes shorter and shorter.

That is, during any indivisible moment or instant it is at the place where it is. For example, Zeno is often said to have argued that the sum of an infinite number of terms must itself be infinite—with the result that not only the time, but also the distance to be travelled, become infinite. Zeno’s paradoxes are often pointed to for a case study in how a philosophical problem has been solved, even though the solution took over two thousand years to materialize.

The cut can be made at a rational number or at an irrational number. He gives an example of an arrow in znon.

Zeno’s Paradoxes

When we consider a university to be a plurality of students, we consider the students to be wholes without parts. A good source in English of primary material on the Pre-Socratics with detailed commentary on the controversies about how to interpret various passages. It was said to be a book of paradoxes defending the philosophy of Parmenides.

Advocates of the Standard Solution would add that allowing a duration to be composed of indivisible moments is what is needed for having a fruitful calculus, and Aristotle’s recommendation is an obstacle to the development of calculus. This is key to solving the Dichotomy Paradox, according to the Standard Solution.

Zeno’s Paradoxes | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

It is usually assumed, based on Plato’s Parmenides a—dthat Zeno took on the project of creating these paradoxes because other philosophers had created paradoxes against Parmenides’ view. But for another purpose we might want to say that a student is a plurality of biological cells. This argument is called the Dichotomy because it involves repeatedly splitting a distance into two parts.

  KAFIRKAH AKU PDF

Aristotle said Zeno assumed this is impossible, and that is paardojas of his errors in the Dichotomy. So, at any time, there is a finite interval during which the arrow can exhibit motion by changing location. Perhaps, as some commentators have speculated, Zeno used the Achilles Paradox only to attack continuous space, and he intended his other paradoxes such as the “Arrow” and the “The Moving Rows” to attack discrete space.

These arguments are challenged in Hntikka In fact, Achilles does this in catching the tortoise, Russell said.

Paradojas de Zenón – La flecha

And he employed the method of indirect proof in his paradoxes by temporarily assuming some thesis that he opposed and then attempting to paradpjas an absurd conclusion or a contradiction, thereby undermining the temporary assumption.

The key idea is to see a potentially infinite set as a variable quantity that is dependent on being abstracted from a pre-exisiting actually paradomas set. International Journal for Robust and Nonlinear control. Physicsa25 In modern real analysis, a continuum is composed of points, but Aristotle, ever the advocate of common sense reasoning, claimed that a continuum cannot be composed of points.

Let the machine switch the lamp on for a half-minute; then switch it off for a quarter-minute; then on for an eighth-minute; off for a sixteenth-minute; and so on. If we give his paradoxes a sympathetic reconstruction, he correctly demonstrated that some important, classical Greek concepts are logically inconsistent, and he did not make a mistake in doing this, except in the Moving Rows Paradox, the Paradox of Alike and Unlike and the Grain of Millet Paradox, his weakest paradoxes.

Abraham Robinson in the s resurrected the infinitesimal as an infinitesimal number, but F. Fowler TranslatorLoeb Classical Library.