ISO Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment – Part 1 : Metrological Confirmation System for Measuring Equipment. ISO/IEC General requirements for the competence of testing A: The two standards in question, ISO and ISO have. ISO INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO. First edition .. and replaces ISO and ISO , of which it.
|Published (Last):||14 March 2011|
|PDF File Size:||14.82 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
From the scope of ISO The competence referred to in the title of the standard relates to the competence of the entire system — not just training of personnel.
Difference Between ISO/IEC and ISO –
You can consider it a system within the quality management system. Even if the organization chooses to adhere to the requirements of ISOthe ido to ISO does not imply certification to the requirements of ISO General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratoriesand I would like guidance on usage and application of these standards.
Discussion related to the ios and timing of equipment calibration. ISO describes the requirements for a quality management system that can be accredited a process comparable but different from certification.
ISO – Wikipedia
If calibrations are just a subsidiary aspect of your business, then spending the money to get accredited may not be necessary, especially if its for internal use only. ISO is a guidance document and not intended for certification. While the scope of both documents includes language that can perhaps cause confusion, what follows is 100112-1 salient text from both that illuminates the difference between the two.
Root Cause Analysis Samples. Denise Robitaille Vice Chair, U. However if you are performing calibrations for other companies, and you are not accredited yet, I strongly recommend Z There is a great deal of richness in the ISO family of documents and it is a shame for users to not know about and take advantage of 10012- full range of possibilities.
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress.
It also depends on the focus of your business. Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress Discussion related to the importance and timing of equipment calibration.
ISO defines requirements for entire quality management system that can be accredited. ISO focuses on the requirements of the measurement management system.
Difference Between ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 10012
Skip to content Q: Pricey, however that is the direction calibrations are going in the future. It addresses such factors as contracts with customers, purchasing, internal auditing, and management review of the entire quality management system — ISO does not.
It encompasses all aspects of the laboratory.
It defines requirements relevant to the measurement management system in language that may illustrate interrelations to other parts of an overall quality management system.
An organization, for example, could have a quality management systems that is certified to ISO Metrology Program 1001-21, Quality Progress. If you want to generate true confidence of measurement that your customers and AB appreciate, then of all of those standards, I recommend Ixo In summary, ISO is a guidance document that addresses one element namely management of a measurement system of a quality management system.
Correctly applied measurement, wherever and however it occurs, is an essential element of a successful business QMS. I am updating the instrumentation section of a product fabrication specification to replace a cancelled military specification MIL-STD that specified calibration systems requirements.