License Eucon Protocol to Third Party Manufacturers Allow other companies full access to the Eucon code base so they can develop next. It’s funny how people are asking SSL, Neve etc to integrate Eucon into their consoles without thinking that the reason AVID bought Euphonix. Everywhere this protocol is brought up, it’s highly praised. I don’t believe that Eucon is that much of a closed protocol anymore since Avid’s.
|Published (Last):||21 December 2016|
|PDF File Size:||11.67 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If you set up the daw to output pre-fader directly to the converter then any moves that happen only effect the analog side and the output of the daw remains the same. Essentials Only Full Version. Haven’t received registration validation E-mail? User Control Panel Log out.
If you have the money, it might be worth it. The time now is While these are not yet listed on the Euphonix website, Sweetwater does have them listed.
Yes, but they can’t stop you from making or marketing something compatible, unless they have a straight patent on the core technology. I just read again doc about HUI protocol.
The hardware unit on the bottom and the plug-in UI above. Not to mention two-way fader feedback.
Sequoia 11 DAW Software Now Supports EuCon Protocol For Connectivity To Euphonix Pro Consoles
Find More Posts by airon. I found another introduction of the protocol with a bit more detail as well: The second edition of the product has just been released at NAMM and Softube announced that the the Console 1 prorocol will boast even more power than the first edition for less money as now, people will also be able to load UAD plug-ins into console 1.
Maybe a better control surface implementation will emerge from this that’s better for all eufon users. May 06 3: It is the only control protocol that can take full control of all Pro Tools features including plug-in selection and parameters.
Hey If it’s to drive audio fader with servo the MCU protocol is fine. User Name Remember Me? Send a private message to norbury brook.
Future Sonar Support for EuCon Protocol? | Cakewalk Forums
After you get used to working one of these I am sure that it can come in handy, especially for those working with post-production. I think that in my fucon studio I would have both a version of the Raven console and the Console 1.
I’m still kind of hoping Frontier will do something similar but for less money and, of course, their great and personal prltocol. I found this http: However, the people from SSL endorsed this product and I think they might have a pretty good idea about how an SSL console should sound. I’d guess portocol highly unlikely that EUCON lacks some form of encryption, however – making this a non-trivial effort.
The Slate Raven MTi2.
You can get used to it right? Kevinlane Max Output Level: However, again, I recommend that all those interested in HUI control surfaces for Pro Tools should try TouchDAW on a tablet before committing to a big buy — it is simply exactly the same as a hardware controller only on a tablet and very cheap. One product that seems to fall exactly into that category is The Console 1 from Softube.
Here’s someone who seems to have it working:. Manual authorization, support cases, and manual order processing will be delayed. These look slick, but kinda pricey for the functionality they offer well, not really sure – that touchscreen looks like it could get pretty deep. I also understand from forums that their Eucon implementation is fairly CPU-intensive.
The MCU is limited at 9bit step but it’s an hardware limitation, data still 16bit. Originally Posted by airon Maybe a better control surface implementation will emerge from this that’s better for all controller users.
Pro Tools does not use MCU nor does it allow for it Jun 01 7: Bumpage, I wanna know too.
New EuCon Software For Euphonix MC Pro & System 5-MC DAW Controllers
For those wanting a cheap high resolution controller you can actually run the Behringer B-Control units in bit mode. Is that not enough?
I know this is an old thread, but let me know if anyone is interested on getting a project going Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. But trying to get any info I can for a project maybe even a SDK Thanks for your patch, but I actually wanted communication between Max and Eucon-enabled Software, not the Euphonix-Hardware-Controllers though they are sexy.
Well, for euccon intents an purposes, the Console 1 plug-in default is a very powerful mixing tool, as it reproduces the SSL E console accurately.
Taking Control of Pro Tools with a DAW Controller | Pro Tools Production
The build quality is low but at that price you may be able to afford two As mentioned many daws support their hardware I am wondering the possibilities of a couple things with it, 1. You might try to contact him. But human jitter is more in the 8bit range here Zam.