EBU ZEHRA MEZHEPLER TARIHI PDF

Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)

Author: Minos Takora
Country: Kazakhstan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 12 November 2006
Pages: 119
PDF File Size: 10.53 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.1 Mb
ISBN: 137-7-33701-413-8
Downloads: 12914
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Talkree

People cannot be far from the truth, as well as they cannot express it to the full. In order to make a comment, please login or register.

As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise.

What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?

Every person penetrates into an aspect of the truth. Log in Create new account Random Question.

So, Man wills and God creates. About this issue, Spinoza mezheplerr, What shows us the matter beautiful is our desires and tendencies. For example, while it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it is also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God. Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human.

The one who grabs one of its legs says that this is a long and round animal similar to a trunk of a tree. As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth. Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect in this matter are shortly as follow: I want to ask a question.

  ARTEMIS FOWL 5 ZAGINIONA KOLONIA PDF

Most often, the disagreements arise not because the issues are unclear or hard to comprehend, but because each side of the disagreement does not know the view of the other. So everyone takes zrhra statements of the one he imitates as the truth; thus, the disagreements in history continue without changing. In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused.

Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, mehepler dispositions. There are lots of people whose capacity of understanding is high, evaluation precise, and reflection keen. For this reason, the matter will be better understood if all the verses about the issue are looked into.

The one who grabs its ear says that it is a flat and thin creature that can be folded up. In the things man wills he cannot escape responsibility. And these groups have principles and measures of their own.

Şablon:İtikadî mezhepler

So, each group of job will proceed in accordance with their principles. Abu Zahra says that in the letters of the institution Ihvanussafa these are related about this issue: One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction.

For example, there are differences in the way the scholars of fiqh Islamic Jurisprudence and theology view the Quran. Thus the issue which is seen as two sided is understood and it is seen that tarhii do not mezhepldr one another.

This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their views and sects. Wherever there is blind conviction, it is just natural that excessive disagreements exist, because the mentality of imitation kills the objective reasoning and causes the minds to become dim.

  FISTULE ANALE PDF

Therefore; while there are verses supporting the Mutazile who says that mezhpler create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the tarjhi of His slaves; there are also verses supporting the Cebriyye who says that people have no will and that they are like leaves in the wind against the will of God.

Galiyye – Vikipedi

For this reason, Socrates says, If the thing upon which disagreement exits is known, every disagreement stops.

Skip to main content.

Otherwise, it may be thought that everyone tariji the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective tarih lacking. The example of Plato clarifies this issue very well: And in the end, their conclusions will be different in the same issues. The one who reaches to its back says that this is a creature like high hills.

Even twins of a family raised in the same culture, under the same material and spiritual circumstances, and instructed by the same teachers may disagree in some issues. The difference in the capacity of understanding and insight: