4. dbx reserves the right to make changes in design or make additions to or .. Congratulations on your purchase of the dbx AFS™ The AFS Advanced . dbx AFS (AFS in line between mixer and amplifier) as shown below. . A little practice and experimentation will make you an AFS expert in no time. Get the guaranteed best price on Feedback Suppression like the dbx AFS Stereo/Dual Mono Feedback Suppression Processor at Musician’s Friend.
|Published (Last):||21 September 2018|
|PDF File Size:||9.37 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ebx more information, please visit the manufacturer’s website. One thing about the AFS that I don’t like is the user interface. Worst offender was the singer with a spot monitor, but the helped.
The control of the device is not hard to figure out, but it is not intuitive. I had a couple of the Behringer units and found them useless. Qfs never used one nor have I seen one in use anywhere.
dbx DBXAFS2-V Replacement for dbx AFS | B&H Photo Video
Our last gig, we had to wait for a party of 8 eating pizza with their kids to finish up so we could move tables to set up. The feedback had to reach very high levels before the unit could find it. Dave C arugo Jr. Can anyone give some input on this unit?
From the powerful DSP module to the no-nonsense user interface, the AFS provides all the processing and control necessary for both installation and live use. The manual is pretty comprehensive: View the Media Kit. Login or Sign Up. DBX Advanced feedback suppression.
No amount of magic feedback suppression or equalization will fix these problems. I have xfs and just started playing with it in the living room last night. I condensed and printed a basic setup and use sheet from the manual, and laminated it to keep handy.
I have both the dbx and the Sabine GRQ.
One of these mics gets passed around for bridal party toasts and MC duties in front of the mains and they are also the main mics for our lead singers that move around the stage a lot. I use one and for our purposes, it works great. As I said in my earlier post, we dxb never once fas a sound check, let alone an opportunity to ring out a room. The one application I can see for them is a performer who wanders the stage or a convention event where a sound tech may not be present at all times.
Product already in the list.
dbx Afs-224 Feedback Suppression Processor Afs224
For my application, which is handling feedback from wireless mics which are mobile in front of the PA, it will work fine. I recall him making some positive statements about them. I would imagine sbx the thing uses only enough filters to solve the problem, probably no more than four or five.
Any input would be great, thanks in advance. Small rooms bars with hard walls, paneling or even a freakin mirror right behind the afe bouncing the monitors right back into the mics I use mine between the send and the amp for monitors.
dbx Pro AFS 224 User Manual
MUEvan wrote on Wed, 07 July So you dont think it sfs work well for use between an aux send and my mons power amps? Of course this only makes sense if it fits in with your system goals. The AFS is an absolute must for any live sound application. I’m thinking of small rooms with bad acoustics. You do need to keep the input gain up for it to work correctly. I’d say better used inserted before the fader.
Has anyone had the chance to mess with this thing? Advertise on the most comprehensive and widely viewed musicians’ website. Or just EQ to taste? If memory serves, Don Boomer has commented on both the dbx and Sabine offerings. Ten and twelve filter feedback elimination processors have become the de facto standard, but the engineering staff at dbx have never been quite content residing in the neighbourhood of the status quo.
The ‘ringer units were justly dumped in the “not with my money” category. To achieve these staggering numbers afw utilised their patent-pending AFS technology that had previously only been available in the upper echelon line of products and made it available in this stand-alone processor, which takes all xfs the guesswork out of feedback removal. I am dvx avid reader here and have seen likes and dislikes. Ideally, you’d have an AFS on every monitor send. Trying to watch the color of a pushbutton is tough when you have your finger on it.
DBX AFS Feedback Suppression – DJ City
I haven’t mixed using one. I used to 22 another dbx unit on the horns and drums monitor sends but since all of the horns went to bell mics and the drummer was replaced with a more dynamic player less of a gorilla I no longer needed the additional two channels of protection. Mike Pyle Audiopyle Sound Dealer: I have some EQs but thinking aafs getting one of these?
Thats what I was primarily going to use it for.
Doubtful the customers would appreciate us ringing out the room. One of the claimed advantages of these dbc is that the Q is much more narrow than a typical 31 band EQ.